Who would’ve thought? This isn’t going to fly with the EU.

Article 5.3 of the Digital Markets Act (DMA): “The gatekeeper shall not prevent business users from offering the same products or services to end users through third-party online intermediation services or through their own direct online sales channel at prices or conditions that are different from those offered through the online intermediation services of the gatekeeper.”

Friendly reminder that you can sideload apps without jailbreaking or paying for a dev account using TrollStore, which utilises core trust bugs to bypass/spoof some app validation keys, on a iPhone XR or newer on iOS 14.0 up to 16.6.1. (ANY version for iPhone X and older)

Install guide: Trollstore

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    165 months ago

    Who would’ve thought? This isn’t going to fly with the EU.

    Article 5.3 of the Digital Markets Act (DMA): “The gatekeeper shall not prevent business users from offering the same products or services to end users through third-party online intermediation services or through their own direct online sales channel at prices or conditions that are different from those offered through the online intermediation services of the gatekeeper.”

    Apple has an annual legal budget of approximately infinity dollars. I assure you they are aware of this and they believe they are in compliance, even if just barely.

    If challenged, they will have no problem fighting it — they have nearly as much cash on hand as the entire EU budget.

    I hope the EU challenges this, and I hope the EU wins, but Apple isn’t going to be surprised by whatever happens.

    • Jvrava9OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      75 months ago

      The fine would be approximately 10% of Apple’s total revenue and the fine increases by 10% every violoation so I doubt that Apple can not accept the regulations.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        35 months ago

        Unfortunately, Apple has the resources, both legal and financial, to tie that up in the EU courts for decades.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          35 months ago

          What if I told you one of those two can make new laws?

          In one afternoon the Commission+Parliament can change the basis of whatever case Apple wants to fight. And they are up against Vestager - she makes multinational software companies bend the knee twice before lunch.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 months ago

      There’s the letter and there’s the spirit of the law. Even if Apple has found a brilliant loophole the courts can just say well it’s technically true but you’re still breaking the law nonetheless, lawyer budget be damned.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        The EU court is a Roman court, not an Anglo Saxon court. The spirit of the law is what matters, not the technicalities.

        Second, the EU can change the laws that create the outcome they don’t like. By the people, for the people. Apple will play within the EU’s rules or Apple won’t play in the EU.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 months ago

      They will get free publicity and show the users how they stand up to the overreaching government. Their users will eat it up.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 months ago

      Apple has also been known to ignore laws and pay fines for breaking them. The store is a major revenue stream so they might just do that.