People keep talking about “Federalizing the National Guard” and now you’ve got other States pledging their NG to Texas in defiance of the Supreme Court (see image).

So is this what CW2 looks like?

P.S. I’m a Brit

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1265 months ago

    Highly unlikely this is what the civil war would be like. It’s not a state v state thing necessarily although that might be a small part of it. In the first civil war, the south unified and its people largely supported the war, except their slaves. It’s unlikely something like that will happen again. It’s not impossible but unlikely.

    What is much more likely is rural v city. Even in red states, cities are blue and will often vote for blue policies. Rural areas are where things get dicey. They’ve been largely left behind by the surge in industry and general expansion of the capitalist economy we currently have (they’ve had a lot of businesses (including grocery stores) close because more people are leaving, and their rural towns are frequently having their hospitals close leaving large swaths of areas where the nearest hospital is an hour away). As such, they’ve got a grudge against the cities. What’s likely to happen is rural counties and their local governments trying to cut off their food supply, starving the cities to win the battle. There’s tons more possibilities, but this one I think is the one that’s got the highest likelihood.

    Another possibility that is scary, but is highly dependent on the party of the people in power, is the government using their power to actually strike the cities, like in Syria where Assad bombed and used chemical weapons on his own people. Syria is actually a pretty good example of what more modern civil wars are like, or can be like. Governments v rebels and militias, and cities v rural (although there’s much less rural land in Syria).

    If you’re interested, the podcast It Could Happen Here has a great first season where they go over possible disasters including a civil war and a pandemic (it was actually made in 2019 so before covid). It’s really helpful and can teach a lot, especially for an outsider from across the pond. It also does a lot better job giving an explanation and actual sources.

    Hope this helps since it didn’t seem like you were getting a real answer.

    • deweydecibel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      44
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The geographical separation of slave states by an actual border allowed the first Civil War to take place on a stage perfectly suited for traditional warfare. North/South division and the formal joining of the Confederacy by state governments kept it all straightforward. Point South and tell the generals “Go.”

      It definitely won’t be that simple again.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      155 months ago

      Another thing the world ought to know is that the folks who are identified by “red” and “right” in America are in the minority.

      Significantly so.

      However our voting system uses geography / land as a modifier so while there are less of them they occupy a larger land mass and have an outsized vote strength because of that.

      When total votes in a state can be split 45-55 but the delegates go 90-10 there is a problem

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        165 months ago

        Another fun thing about that is that most folks who identify “red” or “right” actually aren’t paying enough attention to know that. Go ask them, they think people like them make up 70% or more of the country. If they do try to activate their little civil war they are going to find themselves very quickly surrounded by folks who do not like them at all, as their expected 200-million strong army ends up actually only being 1.5 million people spread out over 30,000+ square miles. Watching the realization dawn on them might actually even be fun if it weren’t a herald of Troubles for America.

      • BaldProphet
        link
        fedilink
        25 months ago

        Another thing the world ought to know is that the folks who are identified by “red” and “right” in America are in the minority.

        Significantly so.

        This isn’t accurate. In 2020, 29% of voters identified as Republican, 33% as Democrat, and 34% as independent. There certainly were more Democrats, but only by a 5% margin.

        Playing up exaggerated differences between the number of Democrats and Republicans and emphasizing the “we outnumber you” rhetoric is extremist and should be avoided. It makes you a part of the problem.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      125 months ago

      I had to stop listening to ICHH it gave me way too much anxiety and was just too stressed back when i listened in 2020. I’ve since taken up to instead listen to BTB and cool people who did cool stuff off the same network. Monsters that are usually dead and people who kick ass make me feel better.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -75 months ago

      What is much more likely is rural v city.

      Isn’t it even more likely trump disciples vs reasonable people?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        10
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        So if you break it down (based on the last I looked at it, Pew Research iirc):

        • Urban counties are twice as likely to be Democratic
        • Suburban had leaned Republican for years, but suburbs have been leaning Democrat for a bit under a decade.
        • Rural (on the same timeframe as the suburbs) has been going more Republican, though just a bit less in the ratio as Urban.

        The most Trump support is in rural, where more than half support him fully (so full maga territory). Republicans there are more likely to be full maga than in suburbs or urban areas, where republican maga support drops by about 10%.

        Democrats in the same areas are fairly equal across the board in their lack of support for trump, about a 50% greater dislike by Democrats in those areas then liked by Republicans.

        The urban, suburban, rural breakdown is very accurate as a representation of maga enthusiasm.

        EDIT: I though it important to mention too that Republicans in rural areas have an age split as well. Gen X-ish and up is where the support for Trump is, about 50% more than the millennial and under Republicans.

      • BaldProphet
        link
        fedilink
        25 months ago

        This is oversimplifying the problem. Democrats from urban areas have failed for decades to adequately address the needs and concerns of rural voters. When one party ignores you (and often speaks of you with open contempt), it’s a no-brainer that you would be inclined to vote for the party that caters to your concerns. The Democrats handed rural voters to Trump on a golden platter.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    965 months ago

    “Fuck yeah, secession!” Says the Texan from the comfort of their lounge chair, beer in hand.

    These people are too comfortable to ever be willing to die for their stupid ideals. All it took was one MAGA idiot to get blasted on Jan 6th and then they all scattered like roaches. As soon as their lives were on the line, it was no longer a matter of grave importance. They all firmly believed that democracy was at stake, but were unwilling to fight for it to the death because they somehow must have known that it was bullshit, somewhere in the back of their pea-sized brains, they knew.

    By the time Texas starts asking people to show up to mustering fields, rifle in hand, the facade will fall apart. Biden doesn’t need to do anything. This sideshow of bluster and saber-rattling will fall apart on it’s own.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    825 months ago

    It’s not a totally unreasonable impression, but no, this will not turn into a second civil war. The Guard units of each state can be called up for federal duty. The National Guard is part of the US Department of Defense and thus ultimately answers to the DoD and the US president as commander in chief. The US military has multiple components, including regular services (eg the full time Army), reserve components (eg US Army Reserve) and National Guard components. The latter two are part-time military with one weekend per month training duty plus an annual training. Guards members and Reservists hold regular full time jobs.

    The Guard units are deployable by the governors of their respective states, and so can be used in emergency situations like natural disasters. They have also been deployed against what have been perceived as riots that threaten lives and properties of the individual states.

    However, they are subject to activation by order of the US president and they fall under the national command authority. Guard personnel take the same oath to the constitution as other military personnel, and cannot legally refuse federal activation. Guards personnel would be subject to courts martial and face potentially extreme penalties including being discharged from service under criminal conditions, being stripped of rank and benefits, and jail time in federal prison. This would be what we call a career limiting rule.

    So, if push comes to shove, Biden can activate the NG and order them to stand down or to implement policies to maintain order. Thinking the NG units and in particular their commanders would disobey a presidential order because they just love their state governor and hate the president so much is getting into Turner Diaries levels of right wing apocalyptic fantasy.

  • Flying Squid
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    685 months ago

    I said this in another thread-

    Most Americans aren’t interested or even capable of fighting in a civil war. When you live paycheck-to-paycheck, you’re not going to abandon your family to fight on the front lines.

    And a huge percentage of Americans live paycheck-to-paycheck.

    Texas would have to have a draft.

    Good luck with that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      125 months ago

      Not to mention states themselves are never more than 60%/40% leaning either way. It’s not like the more homogeneous populations of the 1800s.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        65 months ago

        Bingo. If Texas tried to leave, a HUGE chunk of the population would revolt against the State of Texas. Many more would just leave. Very little good would remain.

    • nifty
      link
      fedilink
      45 months ago

      The tech bros in Austin are not going to the front lines. Front line at airport, maybe.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -25 months ago

      You’re wrong though. The general public is more likely to engage in civil unrest when they’re struggling. The reality though is that while many Americans might be living paycheck to paycheck, they’re not poor and not struggling. They are just bad at managing their finances and they have a lot to lose.

      If you have more to lose than to gain, you won’t participate in a civil war. But when you’re a slave working in a cotton field, you have nothing to lose, only something to gain.

      The idea that your average American is so poor is just laughable.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        55 months ago

        I’m just imagining the sales of golf carts or those scooters going through the roof because Americans cant run a couple of miles during a civil war.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        45 months ago

        Bad at managing their finances

        Either you’re being purposefully deceitful, or you have a horrible understanding of macroeconomics. But please, let’s just continue to ignore the elephants named record-inflation, rent records and housing crisis in the room.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        35 months ago

        There is a term for this called the “Valley of revolt” basically a people need enough empowerment to revolt but not enough to feel heard.

        Also it’s not necessarily just “bad with finances” it’s that our expected standard of living doesn’t match our actual standard of living. Rising cost and stagnant wages and all that.

      • iquanyin
        link
        fedilink
        35 months ago

        over half a million live on the streets. flat out homeless. and then, the working poor, which you are if you live paycheck to paycheck. also, if you can’t live unless you work, you’re the working class.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    66
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    A lot of you all must be too young to remember. This isn’t a new thing for Texas to do. They threatened to secede at least once (maybe twice) while Obama was president. Once it was straight out of the North Korean playbook, claiming a training exercise the military was conducting was a cover for a military invasion of Texas.

    • Scrubbles
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The older I get the more I eyeroll at the political posturing. It’s definitely worse than when I was younger, but also it’s all happened before. It’s just loud people trying to be loud to keep us all afraid and obediently going to work, then every 4 years it gets loud again so we vote for who they want us to.

      Real convenient the border is such a huge issue a few months before the election.

      Of course we still have to take it seriously, the minute we let our guard down they start implementing stuff, look at roe v wade, but even then they didn’t know what to do after that. It’s all about staying in power for them

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I get what you’re saying, but at some point we have to admit that there really aren’t any adults at the table. A direct example is the governments covid response and another more recent is the emergence of the so-called freedom caucus. Basically I subscribe to the depressing notion that all these fuck head fascists that came before have sewn their seeds and now there is an alarmingly large amount of the populace who have drank the koolaid, made from those seeds, and even worse is a lot of the original sewers (heh), have lost the thread and are drinking their own koolaid…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        35 months ago

        Ok, but we also haven’t had such extreme right wingers in mainstream government before.

        And also, what about the National Guard thing?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      175 months ago

      And thats why I’m not worried about them doing anything other than what they’re already doing. They know they would be fucked if they leave.

      And if they do? Well then we deal with it when that time comes. Hopefully a bunch of left leaning people leave, including my brother and his wife, and a bunch of MAGAts can go there and talk about how much they love America while also leaving it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        55 months ago

        They’d have no issue, they already consider everything outside of their small town to be Fake America.

        • athos77
          link
          fedilink
          15 months ago

          There was some guy back in the day who was stating in all seriousness, that Texas was more hurt by the 9/11 attacks than New York was.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      15
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Texas has made an issue over their independence and God-given right to be Texas, in defense of their the right to own chattel slavery since their first secession. From Mexico. In 1836.

      Texas reconfirmed their desire to die on the hill of their divine right to own people, by seceding from the US in 1861.

      After the civil war, Texas was a haven for the Confederates - and their ideology has been fomenting ever since

      They’ve been talking of secession openly since at least the 1990s.

      I think this is the first time since the civil war that other states have involved their national guards in support of a hotbed issue that could lead to a secession.

      Edit: correction to grammatical error.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      95 months ago

      The Dollop did a podcast on Jade Helm as it was happening. Definitely recommend listening to that one if you like American history podcasts. It’s episode 100 I believe

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    655 months ago

    At current, this is all posturing. If Biden does engage the military to stop them. Perhaps lock up the governors for treason, maybe it could escalate somewhat. If something did happen that was in the line of being more serious, it wouldn’t be a long incursion as long as the military obeyed the commander in chief. The national guard is absolutely no match for even a small slice of the might of the US military.

    If something does happen, hopefully they’ll shut it down quickly and bloodlessly, maybe finally gather enough strength to enable some Germany type of anti-fascism laws.

    We need to fix gerrymandering, we need to fix people screwing with elections. We need to put some strong protections against the propaganda and opinion pieces flowing out of all the news outlets. We need to force free non-political basic education to the entire f****** country so people can make some informed decisions about s***.

    I’m tired of everybody looking at politics like it’s a f****** football game.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      85 months ago

      And if Trump gets in again? All the people not crazy going to along with him, or will he be to deploying the army? At what point does the apparatus of state start to split as people within it don’t all go with crazy orders?

      If I was Putin, or CCP, helping the crazies is the best money spent.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      85 months ago

      What are the chances of China attacking us during the civil war? Or taking Taiwan (we NEED Taiwan for our silicon production)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Us, never. Just like with China you can’t win a land war over here, and a home attack has a greater risk of uniting is against a common enemy.

        Taiwan possibly. Though I don’t think so. Taiwan is much more useful as a political chess piece that China can beat their chests about. They can invoke the island and be offended about support for it whenever they need leverage right now.

        Not to mention it isn’t just the US alone that needs Taiwan and movement there risks a global response.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            25 months ago

            Define support.

            They’re not devoid of allies beyond the US and in general have vocal support of most of the western world.

            But only 13 countries recognize them as a country, but not even the US is on that list of 13. Interestingly however, the Vatican does recognize them.

            Which is why, they’re remain a nice political chess price for China.

    • Cosmic Cleric
      link
      fedilink
      25 months ago

      We need to put some strong protections against the propaganda and opinion pieces flowing out of all the news outlets.

      Something tells me this one is a non-starter, as any new laws will slam up against the Constitution, over and over again.

      Having said that, I would love to at least seen a real-time label, in a large font size, on any monitor/tv that specifies that what’s being shown is an opinion piece, and not a factual article/show.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Something tells me this one is a non-starter, as any new laws will slam up against the Constitution, over and over again.

        The first amendment states that congress shall not abridge freedom of the press. In reality it needs to be strengthened because speech and press isn’t free anymore, it’s overwhelmingly controlled by interest with huge amounts of economic power. The reason for freedom fo speech and press is that dissenting ideas and thoughts are heard in order to have accountability. Which the current interpretation is doing the opposite of.

        For example you could pass laws that any journalist has the right to voice his own opinion and not be fired or discriminated against by his employer (as long as he doesn’t discriminate himself or uses hate speech). That would not abridge the freedom of the press. Basically give the journalists more freedom from their owners.

        Or you could make a law that forces owners to sell their media empires into trusts that are democratically controlled by the journalists / workers, and finance it through a bank. This would not abridge the freedom of the press (which is not the same as the owner).

        Of course this is unthinkable and the current supreme court would never allow it. But we shouldn’t accept the degenerate view that freedom of the press is the same as turning speech and news into a commodity that is owned by the elite. And especially in a plutocracy that basically is state owned media.

        You could appoint a 100 young people as new supreme court judges and then pass these modern laws and election reform also limiting the future excesses of the supreme court. There isn’t really anything stopping the Democrats from doing that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        If we go into a civil war, the Constitution’s going to slam up against a lot of changes.

        GOP is ignoring the shit out of the Constitution already why should it protect them? They already tried to dismantle the executive branch and turn the presidency into a dictatorship. Now they’re going after the judicial branch. Nah, they’re going to game the Constitution until the US is forced to change it. It’s either going to happen slowly over time, or quickly after a pretty substantial bloodbath.

        We can’t just sit here and go oh look It’s Hitler incarnate, but you know first amendment, oh damn, they ignored some laws and found some loopholes I guess we had just better conform to oppression by the minority. We better all get some swastikas.

        This country isn’t going to go quietly into dictatorship for fear of failing to make everyone happy. The Democrats are weak because they try to follow the rules, They try to give breaks to the people that f*** them over because they don’t want to hurt the other people, but like everything else there’s a line. When Americans are shooting each other over propaganda, The propaganda’s going to have to f****** go.

    • Queen HawlSera
      link
      fedilink
      English
      145 months ago

      Better yet, can we have a government that doesn’t pretend things are fine and actually doe something about the fucking fascists?

    • unalivejoy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      65 months ago

      Please let us have a normal election season

      With the Trump? NO WAY!

    • Cosmic Cleric
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Can we just have a normal, boring year for once, please? I’m so tired…

      I’m right there with you.

      But at least you can think of this to console you: You’re not actually fighting in a world/civil war, down in some troops trench somewhere, reading this (at least that’s my hope for you).

      Other generations have had to go through major wars, but so far we’ve been dodging that bullet, for the most part.

      Things could be a lot worse.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    585 months ago

    My take on it is that the Republicans will do their best to drag this out until the election. No compromising or middle ground. Just make it out to be the crazy Democrats fault. This stuff gets to be very predictable after all these years.

    • halva
      link
      fedilink
      185 months ago

      the weird part is the predominantly conservative federal court sided with the presidential administration

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        205 months ago

        I’d say that’s primarily because the conservative arguments have gotten so crazy/illegal that it’d be hard for almost any judge to agree with it. They ruled against Moore v. Harper and almost everything Trump tried to do with the election for example.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      95 months ago

      Of course, they will drag it out until the elections. It is only being done because of the elections. It is all a performance to rally their base and get them to vote. Too many Republicans are tired of, or at least too embarrassed by, Trump and the other crazy fuckers, like the Freedom Caucus. While nothing is great, nothing is also so bad that they can really shit on Biden, at least not enough to rally around. Even his support of Israel isn’t something they can use against him since they are 120% pro Israel too. They also seriously need a smoke screen for the shit show that is the impending government shut down.
      It’s all for show, a way to get the very poor but very racist core to take time off of their jobs to go vote for a states right to murder brown children while at the same time diverting attention from the fact that the reason that those poor racists aren’t getting their social security and other government support is due to the Republicans massive incompetence.

  • Jaysyn
    link
    fedilink
    575 months ago

    This is exactly why DeSantis wants to revive the Florida State Guard.

    Biden should ignore Abbott right until the point he signs an order to interfere with Federal agents on duty. Then it’s a conspiracy & the Insurrection Act can be brought into play to clean house.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    525 months ago

    No this is all Republican division. It’s their only playbook to rally their base. The take home message for everyone is VOTE, VOTE, VOTE. Before the election started up we had a nice quiet 2-1/2 years. This kind of shit only appeals to those that love the chaos that Trump will bring back.

    • CashewNut 🏴󠁢󠁥󠁧󠁿OP
      link
      fedilink
      65 months ago

      It’s very tiresome. This also feels a lot more agro than interrogating a president about getting a BJ.

      Why are your lunatics so energetic, crazy and numerous? They seem to be getting worse. Some BJ obsessions in the 90s. Then tea parties in the 00s. Now it’s full-blown inssurection with Texas wanting to secede.

      Now that all the crazies have joined their “god army” and trundled down to the border would it be a good time to nuke them? Just wipe out all the lunatics in one go. Problem solved.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        155 months ago

        Why are your lunatics so energetic, crazy and numerous?

        Simple, Russian and Chinese bots on social media designed to foment division, anger, and the destruction of western democracy. It’s the exact same thing that led to Brexit and the election of Trump. And it will get worse until we get a handle on blocking bad actors on social media.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -85 months ago

      It’s not Republican division. A lot of Americans are disgusted with the open border and the gross inaction of our government.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    505 months ago

    It all seems quite a bit overblown to me. There’s legal precedent for the President to take over a state’s national guard and use federal troops to enforce a court order (see Brown v Board of Education):

    “In September 1957, Arkansas governor Orval Faubus called out the Arkansas Army National Guard to block the entry of nine black students, later known as the “Little Rock Nine”, after the desegregation of Little Rock Central High School. President Dwight D. Eisenhower responded by asserting federal control over the Arkansas National Guard and deploying troops from the U.S. Army’s 101st Airborne Division stationed at Fort Campbell to ensure the black students could safely register for and attend classes. […]” (Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Board_of_Education)

    The current wording of the Insurrection Act provision (which has been amended a few times since initial adoption), according to Wikipedia:

    "Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion."
    

    Just my $.02 but I’d guess either the feds back down or Texas does. Hopefully nobody gets trigger happy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      17
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The reference to Little Rock Nine suddenly made me realize that Forest Gump was 38 at the time of Forest Gump.

      I’m 38 now. As tired as I am of Hollywood reimagining films from the nineties, I would appreciate a Forest Gump born in the 80s. The whole concept could really be repeated every 30 years or so.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        95 months ago

        Brother, your idea is commendable, but the weave of history will be incinerated if you give all of that malign power to the Bubba Gump Shrimp Company.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      125 months ago

      The aftermath of racial desegregation court victories are some of the most interesting things in recent US history. A law would be struck down and sort of left like that… and people would take it upon themselves to organize and challenge the new law, often in the face of violent opposition. Freedom Riders taking busses down to the south to challenge desegregation of public transit being met with mobs and put in jail.

    • Ook the Librarian
      link
      fedilink
      15 months ago

      inb4 Brown v Board was wrongly decided.

      I want to say one of Trump’s candidates for a judgeship hinted at that.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    505 months ago

    It’s not a new civil war reason. It’s the same one as last time just packaged up a little different.

    Racism

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    50
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Seems to be a distinct possibility. Posturing prior to the election, rattling sabers, they’re spoiling for a full-on shootin’ war contingent on losing the election, in my opinion.

    edit: I dare say, it might even be strategically advantageous for them to intentionally try lose, claim it was rigged, and use that to go live with the 4th riech.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -125 months ago

      I think the tactical nukes will slow their ambitions for another hundred or so years. We can’t take these posturing fools seriously.

      • deweydecibel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        235 months ago

        We can’t take these posturing fools seriously

        Have you just not been paying attention for the last…decade?

        Yes, we absolutely should.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        195 months ago

        No one is using a tactical nuke on US soil. We have enough conventional bombs to destroy ourselves anyway.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      85 months ago

      At the same time, if we can get the 14th figured out the “pledging troops in opposition to the federal government” seems like the things insurrectionists do.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      55 months ago

      Its a meaningful and new escalation. This dismissive attitude is exactly why there will be a war. These governors should be removed and charged with sedition.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    485 months ago

    Those states are going to be in a rude awakening when they realize they are broke because the blue states are by far the largest contributors to federal funding. When they cut that off, the welfare state will come crawling back quickly.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      105 months ago

      The welfare states regularly turn down federal funding because they do not care about the lower income portions of their state. Alabama will just have fewer people able to feed their selves.