• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -519 hours ago

    Reputation systems. There is tech that solves this but Lemmy won’t like it (blockchain)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1118 hours ago

      You don’t need blockchain for reputations systems, lol. Stuff like Gnutella and PGP web-of-trust have been around forever. Admittedly, the blockchain can add barriers for some attacks; mainly sybil attacks, but a friend-of-a-friend/WoT network structure can mitigate that somewhat too,

      • veroxii
        link
        fedilink
        English
        414 hours ago

        Slashdot had this 20 years ago. So you’re right this is not new.or needing some new technology.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        115 hours ago

        Space is much more developed. Would need ever improving dynamic proof of personhood tests

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          313 hours ago

          I think a web-of-trust-like network could still work pretty well where everyone keeps their own view of the network and their own view of reputation scores. I.e. don’t friend people you don’t know; unfriend people who you think are bots, or people who friend bots, or just people you don’t like. Just looked it up, and wikipedia calls these kinds of mitigation techniques “Social Trust Graphs” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sybil_attack#Social_trust_graphs . Retroshare kinda uses this model (but I think reputation is just a hard binary, and not reputation scores).

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 hours ago

            I dont see how that stops bots really. We’re post-Turing test. In fact they could even scan previous reputation points allocation there and divise a winning strategy pretty easily.